Kazakhstan's first natural hydrogen exploration company

Hydrogen and helium the Earth is already making.

We find and de-risk natural hydrogen and helium: basin screening, field validation, probabilistic resource modelling. Three stages — each one a decision made on evidence rather than optimism.

Natural hydrogen and helium system — animated illustration A painted geological cross-section: meteoric water recharges along faults into a deep iron-rich reaction zone where serpentinization generates hydrogen; hydrogen and radiogenic helium migrate along faults and shale-bounded carriers into an anticline structural trap under a production well and a sandstone stratigraphic trap monitored by a second well. Animated particles trace the water and gas migration. Faults / fracturesmigration pathways Production well(H₂ / He) Monitoring well Organic-rich shalesbarrier / secondary seal Structural trap(anticline) Gas accumulation(H₂ + He) Stratigraphic trap(sandstone) Crystalline basement(very low permeability) Deep iron-rich rock(reaction zone) Radiogenic He — U–Th decay in basement serpentinization — water–rock reaction, no melting 3FeO(rock) + H2O → Fe3O4(rock) + H2 Hydrogen (H₂) Helium (He) Topsoil / weathered rock Sandstone (porous) Siltstone Shale (barrier) Claystone (seal) Iron-rich reaction zone Basement (low permeability) Water / gas migration

What is natural hydrogen?

1

Water meets iron-rich rock deep underground. The reaction — serpentinization — releases hydrogen.

2

Uranium and thorium decay in old basement rock and add helium.

3

Faults carry both gases upward into traps beneath a seal. That is where we look.

Illustration by Geo-Green, not to scale.

The need

A hundred-million-tonne market, waiting for a clean source.

Global hydrogen demand passed 100 million tonnes for the first time in 2025, feeding oil refining, ammonia and methanol today — and steel, shipping and power tomorrow. Yet less than 1% is produced with low emissions; the rest comes from fossil fuels. Scenarios put clean hydrogen demand at 125–585 million tonnes a year by 2050, and whoever supplies it at the lowest cost and carbon intensity owns that curve. Natural hydrogen — generated by the Earth, not manufactured — could be the lowest-cost, lowest-carbon source, and it travels with helium, a gas that has repeatedly been in short supply.

100 Mt+

Global hydrogen demand in 2025 — the first year above that mark

<1%

Share produced with low emissions today; the rest comes from fossil fuels

5×

Growth in committed low-emissions production capacity by 2030

125–585 Mt

Clean hydrogen demand by 2050 across published scenarios

Figures: IEA, Global Hydrogen Review 2025; McKinsey, Global Energy Perspective (2050 demand range).

What we do

We find it, prove it, and size it.

1

Screen

Geology, geophysics and satellite AI narrow tens of thousands of square kilometres to a ranked list of targets.

2

Validate

Field soil-gas surveys and gas geochemistry confirm that hydrogen is there — and where it came from.

3

Quantify

Our in-house simulation turns the evidence into a P10 / P50 / P90 prospective-resource range you can act on.

Who it is for

Licence holders and explorers, energy and mining companies, and investors evaluating natural hydrogen and helium opportunities.

Also available stand-alone

Soil-gas survey campaigns · gas geochemistry · remote-sensing screening · simulation and resource modelling · field-team training. Each stage is commissioned independently.

See the full workflow

Track record

Published field work, not promises.

Kempirsai massif, Kazakhstan

Soil-gas and multispectral remote-sensing survey for natural hydrogen, published in Scientific Reports.

Pricaspian Basin

Machine-learning prospectivity mapping from satellite data, published in Scientific Reports.

Italy and Australia

Hydrogen flux at Larderello and blended H₂ / He gases in the Amadeus Basin, in Chemical Geology and Marine & Petroleum Geology.

See the research

Tell us about the ground you are looking at.

Send us the area, the data you hold, and the decision you are trying to make. We will tell you honestly whether it is worth screening — and if it is not, we will say so before you spend anything.

Who we are

Kazakhstan's first natural hydrogen exploration company.

Geo-Green is a Kazakhstan-registered geoscience company dedicated to natural hydrogen and helium exploration, working at the point where current research meets commercial exploration decisions. We screen basins, validate anomalies in the field, and quantify resources — with calibrated instrumentation, in-house technology and a peer-reviewed methodology.

Our values

Energy from the Earth, without taking it from the landscape.

A soil-gas survey leaves behind footprints and flag pins — no pits, no felled ground, no water drawn from the river. Exploration this light is only possible because measurement, not excavation, does the work.

Hands holding a glass globe with a growing tree inside

Sustainability

Exploration that leaves the landscape as we found it: measurement over excavation, clean primary energy as the goal.

A child studying a globe guided by an elder's hand

Integrity

Transparent methods, stated uncertainties, and advice we would give if the next generation were checking our work — because, in the end, it is.

A green globe connected by a network of clean-energy ideas

Innovation

In-house sensing, machine-learning screening and reservoir simulation — new tools, always anchored to peer-reviewed science and calibrated standards.

The hydrogen landscape

Industry is moving to hydrogen. The question is which kind.

Where hydrogen is used today

Oil refining

NH₃

Ammonia & fertiliser

Methanol & chemicals

Food processing

Where it goes next

Transport & shipping

Power & storage

Industrial heat

Steel & cement

Four ways to make hydrogen. One is already made.

Grey

Reformed from natural gas, CO₂ vented. Nearly all of today's supply.

$1.5–2.5/kg~9–12 kg CO₂e per kg H₂

Blue

Reformed from gas with carbon capture; hinges on CCS cost and capture rates.

$2.0–3.5/kgLower emissions, CCS-dependent

Green

Electrolysis on renewable power. Clean, but energy-intensive to make.

$3.5–6+/kgNear-zero at point of production

Natural (white)

Already made by the Earth — produced, not manufactured. The one we explore for.

~$0.5–1/kg est.Early estimates · ~0.4 kg CO₂e per kg H₂ at high purity

What a kilogram of hydrogen costs to produce

USD per kg of H₂ · typical ranges, 2025 · natural = early estimates $0$1$2$3$4$5$6 per kg Natural made by the Earth Grey gas reforming Blue reforming + capture Green renewable electrolysis $0.5–1 $1.5–2.5 $2–3.5 $3.5–6+ Lowest estimated cost

Why Natural H₂ matters commercially

Natural hydrogen is generated by the Earth wherever ultramafic rock, water and the right temperatures coincide — there is no electrolyser to power and no gas to reform. A still-charging system may even replenish a trap on far shorter timescales than conventional gas; whether it does is one of the questions our surveys are built to answer.

Helium travels with it — same basement, same faults, same surveys — and helium already has a market. A combined target is commercially legible now, not in a decade.

The field is young: commercial production is limited to very few sites, so natural-hydrogen costs and volumes remain estimates until more accumulations are proven.

Figures: IEA, Global Hydrogen Review 2025; Rystad Energy (natural hydrogen cost and carbon intensity); peer-reviewed techno-economic studies, 2025.

The answer

The Earth already makes it — continuously, underground.

Natural hydrogen takes no energy to manufacture: the Earth makes it wherever water meets iron-rich rock. The question is whether an area can be screened, ranked and proven at a cost that justifies drilling.

Hydrogen · serpentinization

3FeO(rock)+H2O→Fe3O4(rock)+H2
Serpentinization at grain scale Water reacts with ferrous iron in olivine, producing magnetite and free hydrogen. H₂O Fe²⁺ H₂

Simplified: ferrous iron (Fe²⁺) in olivine and pyroxene is oxidised to magnetite while water is reduced to H₂. In a real rock, e.g. fayalite: 3Fe₂SiO₄ + 2H₂O → 2Fe₃O₄ + 3SiO₂ + 2H₂.

Helium · radioactive decay

238U→206Pb+8 4He+6β−
How radiogenic helium forms and migrates A uranium- and thorium-bearing mineral grain in basement rock emits alpha particles, which capture electrons and become helium atoms that dissolve in groundwater and rise along a fracture. U · Th α α He in water

Alpha particles (⁴He nuclei) released by uranium and thorium decay in basement rock pick up electrons and become helium atoms, which dissolve in groundwater and rise along faults. Thorium: 232Th → 208Pb + 6 4He + 4β−.

Geological settings

We work where the reaction is plausible, not where the story is fashionable.

Four settings dominate the published record of natural hydrogen. Our methodology is calibrated against published field studies in each.

Ophiolite belts

Obducted oceanic mantle brought to shallow crustal levels. Peridotite dominated by lizardite and Fe-brucite, serpentinizing at temperatures low enough to sustain generation today.

Cratonic basement and rift systems

Iron-rich mafic intrusives beneath sedimentary cover, with the fault architecture to move gas upward and the stratigraphy to trap it.

Geothermal provinces

Active circulation and elevated gradients, where hydrogen flux can often be measured directly at surface manifestations rather than inferred.

Intracratonic basins

Settings where hydrogen occurs blended with methane and helium, and where the commercial case rests on the combined gas stream rather than hydrogen alone.

The method

Three stages. Each one narrows the ground and the risk.

Exploration is a filtering problem: tens of thousands of square kilometres in, a ranked list of drillable prospects out — discarding ground at every step on explicit criteria.

Exploration funnel across three stages Ground under evaluation narrows from basin scale through target zones to defined prospects, as the method changes from desk study to field survey to modelling. Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Basin screening Field validation Prospect definition 10,000s km² 100s km² single km²
1Screen

Basin screening and target generation

We establish whether a credible hydrogen system exists, then narrow it to mappable ground. Geology first: the ultramafic assemblages, their thermal history, the scale of water-rock interaction. Then the geophysics: magnetics for serpentinization fronts, gravity for basement architecture, heat flow for active generation. In parallel, machine-learning analysis of satellite data — vegetation, thermal infrared, iron-oxide ratios — flags the surface expression of seepage.

DeliverableRanked target map with the geological reasoning behind each rank
Decision gateFieldwork proceeds only where geological and geophysical evidence converge independently
Indicative duration6–10 weeks
2Validate

Field validation and gas characterisation

Field crews run systematic soil-gas surveys across the ranked targets, map the faults and fractures that control migration, and record where hydrogen — and helium — rise above background. Molecular and isotopic analysis then establishes origin — because a shallow biogenic signal and a deep serpentinization source imply very different futures for sustained flux.

Stage 2: from a soil-gas survey to a confirmed origin A gridded soil-gas survey, drawn in plan view, finds higher hydrogen readings along a fault. Samples from the anomaly go to the laboratory, where an isotope fingerprint places them with a deep serpentinization source rather than a shallow biogenic one. Soil-gas survey · plan view H₂ above background: low high fault lab Origin · isotope fingerprint shallow biogenic deep serpentinization sample isotope signature of H₂ (illustrative) Output: validated anomalies with confirmed origin. illustrative, not project data
DeliverableValidated anomaly inventory with confirmed genetic attribution
Decision gateAdvancement requires confirmed hydrogen of a demonstrably viable origin
Indicative duration4–8 weeks in field
3Quantify

Resource modelling and prospect ranking

Our in-house software turns geology and measured geochemistry into a model of the full chain — generation, migration, accumulation — and a P10 / P50 / P90 range of prospective resources for each prospect, re-run as new field data arrives. The output is a ranked portfolio that ends at a drilling decision; proving an accumulation takes test wells, beyond our three stages.

Stage 3: from a model chain to ranked prospects A model chain of generation, migration and accumulation feeds thousands of simulated outcomes, shown as a histogram with P90, P50 and P10 volumes marked; the resulting ranges rank three prospects, the best of which becomes the drilling decision. Generation Migration Accumulation thousands of simulated outcomes Possible hydrogen volume P90 P50 P10 low case · mid case · high case Ranked prospects 1 Prospect A 2 Prospect B 3 Prospect C range = P90 to P10 · tick = P50 Output: a drilling decision — drill Prospect A first. illustrative, not project data
DeliverableRanked prospect portfolio with P10 / P50 / P90 volumes
Used forLicensing rounds, partnering, drilling decisions
Indicative duration4–6 weeks

Each stage is commissioned independently. Clients commit capital as evidence accumulates, and we will recommend stopping as readily as advancing. Exploration spend stays proportionate to what the subsurface has actually shown.

The instruments

The numbers come from the ground.

A metre-deep probe, a calibrated analyzer, a position and a time — repeated thousands of times per survey. This is what a station looks like while it works.

Animated soil-gas survey station A soil cross-section with a one-metre probe drawing soil gas up a tube into a portable hydrogen analyzer with a live gauge, while a station log draws a hydrogen anomaly peak. 0 m0.5 m1 m GPS fix H₂ soil-gas 412 ppm Portable H₂ analyzer Soil-gas probe — 1 m Sampling line Station log — illustrative H₂ above background ppm station → anomaly8× background

Animated schematic of a single survey station.

From our field campaigns

Standard field instruments in use: gamma-ray spectrometry for uranium and thorium, the source of radiogenic helium, and a hydrogen analyzer at a soil-gas station.

Gamma-ray spectrometer held against a granite boulder in the field
Gamma-ray spectrometer against outcropping granite
Spectrometer screen showing potassium, uranium and thorium readings
Radioelement readout in the field: potassium, uranium, thorium
Handheld hydrogen analyzer connected to a soil-gas sampling line
Hydrogen analyzer at a soil-gas station
Field engineer holding a hydrogen analyzer beside a soil-gas probe in the ground
Soil-gas probe in the ground, line to the analyzer

Calibrated, industry-standard instrumentation

Every survey runs on the tools the field trusts worldwide: portable hydrogen analyzers calibrated against certified reference gases before and throughout each campaign, every station fixed by GPS, and gas samples cross-checked in the laboratory by gas chromatography and isotopic analysis. Our results stand on recognised standards — the same instrumentation behind the published record of this discipline.

Portable H₂ analyzer Certified calibration gas Lab GC & isotope analysis

Extended by our own probe

Alongside the standard kit we deploy an instrument engineered in-house: a 100 cm × 7 cm downhole probe for continuous, in-situ monitoring — electrochemical cells for H₂ at the tip with He and CO₂ alongside, an onboard logger, and battery-powered WiFi telemetry to the field tablet. It adds a continuous record between calibrated spot measurements; it complements the standards, never replaces them.

SensingH₂, He and CO₂ electrochemical cells + physical sensor
Form100 cm × 7 cm, downhole deployment
Power & dataBattery · onboard data logger · WiFi telemetry

Full specifications on request.

Geo-Green downhole soil-gas probe in the field, streaming live hydrogen readings to a tablet
Probe schematic A 100 by 7 centimetre downhole probe: WiFi cap, battery, data logger with physical sensor, electrochemical helium and carbon-dioxide cells, and a hydrogen cell at the tip. 100 cm 7 cm WiFi telemetry Battery Data logger + physical sensor He & CO₂ cells H₂ cell — electrochemical

The proof

Built on published science you can check.

Our technical work is led by senior geoscientists with an active peer-reviewed record in natural hydrogen. The methods behind our workflow are in the open literature, where they can be checked.

1,200+

Citations to our founding scientists' published research

60+

Peer-reviewed articles by our founding scientists

4

Continents covered by published field studies

Representative peer-reviewed work underpinning the methodology

Integrated multispectral remote sensing and soil-gas measurements for exploring natural hydrogen near the Kempirsai ultramafic massif, western Kazakhstan

Scientific Reports · Stages 1–2

Integrated pixel-wise remote sensing and explainable machine learning for natural hydrogen exploration, Pricaspian Basin

Scientific Reports · Stage 1

Origin of continuous hydrogen flux in gas manifestations at the Larderello geothermal field, central Italy

Chemical Geology · Stage 2

Controls on generation and accumulation of blended gases (CH₄ / H₂ / He) in the Neoproterozoic Amadeus Basin, Australia

Marine & Petroleum Geology · Stages 2–3

Natural hydrogen favorability maps: a new concept for exploration across geological contexts

De Gruyter, 2025 · Stage 1

Academic partnership

Partnered with leading regional universities.

Geo-Green works with leading universities in the region through joint research projects on natural hydrogen. The methods we apply commercially — remote sensing, machine learning, gas geochemistry — are the same ones being developed and published in the peer-reviewed literature, backed by university-grade analytical capability and delivered on commercial timelines.

The people

Led from Kazakhstan. Trained for the field.

Dr. Umut Bakhbergen, Executive Director of Geo-Green
Dr. Umut BakhbergenExecutive Director

Dr. Umut Bakhbergen directs Geo-Green's operations, client engagements and project delivery — staged, documented, and answerable to the evidence.

Behind her is a team of bachelor's-, master's- and doctoral-level geoscientists trained across the full workflow: soil-gas surveying, structural mapping, gas geochemistry, remote sensing and resource modelling — supported by senior academic researchers through the company's university partnerships, and grounded in our peer-reviewed research.